<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Web Toolkit: Morfik technology embraced!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pannonrex.com/2006/05/17/google-web-toolkit-morfik-technology-embraced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pannonrex.com/2006/05/17/google-web-toolkit-morfik-technology-embraced/</link>
	<description>Solutions that Work</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Is Google Doing? at The Morfik Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.pannonrex.com/2006/05/17/google-web-toolkit-morfik-technology-embraced/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is Google Doing? at The Morfik Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 09:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pannonrex.com/blog/?p=28#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Web 2.0 Explorer brings out some rumours about Google licsensed Morfik’s JST - probably not true I think. Morfik supports Java, c#, Visual Basic and Pacal language *syntax*, while the google tool supports Java classes. Peter Illes has some intersting findings as well.  2. It’s not that cool … still. It’s not an IDE, it has only Java language support, the demos does not look that impressive(the Morfik’s demos are so much fun and much, much better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Web 2.0 Explorer brings out some rumours about Google licsensed Morfik’s JST - probably not true I think. Morfik supports Java, c#, Visual Basic and Pacal language *syntax*, while the google tool supports Java classes. Peter Illes has some intersting findings as well.  2. It’s not that cool … still. It’s not an IDE, it has only Java language support, the demos does not look that impressive(the Morfik’s demos are so much fun and much, much better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Web Toolkit released - rumors of Morfik alliance? &#124; Web 2.0 Explorer &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pannonrex.com/2006/05/17/google-web-toolkit-morfik-technology-embraced/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Web Toolkit released - rumors of Morfik alliance? &#124; Web 2.0 Explorer &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 02:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pannonrex.com/blog/?p=28#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks Illés Péter for the tip. I've asked the guys at Morfik for a comment on this - will update if I hear back. Note that I profiled Morfik recently. There have been whispers that both Microsoft and Google have checked out Morfik in the past. Also check out this Google Groups discussion, which throws around the notion that a Google WebOS may be in the works. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks Illés Péter for the tip. I&#8217;ve asked the guys at Morfik for a comment on this - will update if I hear back. Note that I profiled Morfik recently. There have been whispers that both Microsoft and Google have checked out Morfik in the past. Also check out this Google Groups discussion, which throws around the notion that a Google WebOS may be in the works. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
