<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PannonRex &#187; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pannonrex.com/category/iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pannonrex.com</link>
	<description>Solutions that Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 01:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Browser graphics: speed discrepancies galore with clear Safari lead&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/28/browser-graphics-speed-discrepancies-galore-with-clear-safari-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/28/browser-graphics-speed-discrepancies-galore-with-clear-safari-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piprog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canvas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morfik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pannonrex.com/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now this is a completely un-scientific, but very revealing experience. I have run the same page (Sebastien Gruhier&#8217;s PGF test page) in four different browsers with interesting results. This is indeed a continuation of my earlier &#8220;research&#8221; into &#8220;Not all browsers are made equal in speed&#8221;. So the browsers are: Internet Explorer 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_qfe.070227-2300 :-) Firefox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is a completely un-scientific, but very revealing experience. I have run the same page (Sebastien Gruhier&#8217;s <a href="http://prototype-graphic.xilinus.com/samples/shape.html#" target="_blank">PGF test page</a>) in four different browsers with interesting results. This is indeed a continuation of my earlier &#8220;research&#8221; into  <a href="http://www.pannonrex.com/blog/?p=25" target="_blank">&#8220;Not all browsers are made equal in speed&#8221;.</a></p>
<p>So the browsers are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Internet Explorer 6.0.2900.2180.xpsp_sp2_qfe.070227-2300 :-)</li>
<li>Firefox 2.0.0.4</li>
<li>Safari  for Windows 3.0.2 (522.13.1)</li>
<li>Opera 9.21 (Build 8776)</li>
</ul>
<p>I run the page several times in SVG, VML, and Canvas mode on each browser (of course, when it was possible) with the following results:</p>
<ul>
<li>Internet Explorer: only VML is available
<ul>
<li>VML: originally around 4300ms, and with each re-rendering the time increasing by cca. 1800 ms (!) so it went like 4300, 6xxx, 8xxx, 9xxx, and finally jumped to 13109 ms</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Firefox:
<ul>
<li>SVG: generally around 1900 ms, sometimes dropping to 1500ish or peaking at 2300ish ms</li>
<li>Canvas: odd runs: ~1100 ms, even runs: ~750 m, alternating :-)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Safari for Windows:
<ul>
<li>SVG: dead steady on 1070-1030 ms</li>
<li>Canvas: pretty steady around 600-468 ms, mostly in the 490-468 ms range</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Opera:
<ul>
<li>SVG: pretty stable at 2360-2078 ms</li>
<li>Canvas: pretty stable at 1030-860 ms</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Again, the runs were performed on the same machine (2GHz P4, 2GB RAM, WinXP Pro, Commit charge ~1369MB), all browsers running at the same time, but the test performed sequentially.</p>
<p>My informal results:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>SVG</strong>: <strong>Safari</strong> is the king, at least <strong>50%</strong> better, but typically 90-100% better performance than the competitors</li>
<li><strong>Canvas</strong>: again <strong>Safari</strong> is #1, at least <strong>25%</strong> speed advantage, but as good as 100% better &#8212; with quite stable performance in both cases.</li>
<li><strong>VML</strong>: well, let&#8217;s read between the lines ;-) (please note: I did not run IE 7, but IE 6, for technical reasons) &#8211; if we consider its best result in VML and compare to Safari&#8217;s average SVG result (VML and SVG are closer relatives than VML and Canvas), then <strong>Safari is 400% faster</strong>.</li>
<li>Canvas is the overall spead king, SVG is #2, and VML is distant #3.</li>
<li>Safari is king in graphics &#8212; and this is still the first beta release from Apple&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>BTW I got into all this because I&#8217;m looking into how to best implement some of my stuff on the iPhone with Morfik, and also for some graphical stuff I plan to do (charts, Gantt, diagrams, hint-hint:-).</p>
<p>Again, this is not science here: I only tested one rendering task, the environment was quite loaded, did not test IE 7 (although the rest of the browsers were their latest), did not check rendering quality in depth (things looked pretty OK in all cases), etc. Still I consider the results quite relevant &#8212; I&#8217;d like to see what other pepole can say about their experience&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/28/browser-graphics-speed-discrepancies-galore-with-clear-safari-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morfik for iPhone: a dream to come true</title>
		<link>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/27/morfik-for-iphone-a-dream-to-come-true/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/27/morfik-for-iphone-a-dream-to-come-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>piprog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morfik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pannonrex.com/blog/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When iPhone was first announced I was day-dreaming developing applications for it with Morfik. When Safari for Windows appeared my hopes were strengthened since my Morfik apps did work in it (well, kind of &#8212; at least as well as other web content :-). And when it turned out that Steve Jobs&#8217; version of &#8220;opening [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When iPhone was first announced I was day-dreaming developing applications for it with Morfik. When Safari for Windows appeared my hopes were strengthened since my Morfik apps did work in it (well, kind of &#8212; at least as well as other web content :-). And when it turned out that Steve Jobs&#8217; version of &#8220;opening iPhone for 3rd party apps&#8221; boils down to not prohibiting running JavaScript in the browser (mind you, I see his points, and he is right: providing a reliable platform is more important than having a ton of silly gadgets or widgets or what), so at that point, my hopes were high.</p>
<p>And there we are: Morfik just announced that they would release a version of the AppsBuilder that is tailored to iPhone development &#8212; read some more in Richard MacManus&#8217; Read/WriteWeb <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/morfik_builds_first_iphone_development_tool.php" title="Read/WriteWeb story about Morfik for iPhone" target="_blank">post</a>. Wohoo! Now I will be on summer holiday next week, but now I&#8217;ll take my lappy to the beach with me and see to it that some of my warez work by the time I&#8217;m back online :-)</p>
<p>My only request: please, someone send me an iPhone :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pannonrex.com/2007/06/27/morfik-for-iphone-a-dream-to-come-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
